Peru vs Uruguay: PK compounds — Agricultural Use

Peru
103 t
in 2011
Uruguay
248 t
in 2018
Peru rank
35th
Uruguay rank
33rd

PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Peru
  • Uruguay
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200220102018

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 248 t against 103 t in Peru, a difference of 145 t.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 2.4 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uruguay ahead.

Peru ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 33rd of 69 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 95.33 t 110.33 t 15 t Uruguay
2010s 67.5 t 663.5 t 596 t Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Peru or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 248 t against 103 t in Peru as of 2018.
What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Peru and Uruguay?
145 t, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uruguay?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Peru and Uruguay rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
Peru ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 33rd of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 705 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf