China, Hong Kong SAR vs Denmark: PK compounds — Export quantity
PK compounds — Export quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Denmark
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 10.22 t against 9.57 t in Denmark, a difference of 0.65 t.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Denmark ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 65th and Denmark ranks 67th of 84 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.57 t | 276.9 t | 274.33 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 13.94 t | 6,391 t | 6,377 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 8.32 t | 5,108 t | 5,099 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — export quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Denmark?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 10.22 t against 9.57 t in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — export quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Denmark?
- 0.65 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Denmark?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Denmark rank globally for pk compounds — export quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 65th and Denmark ranks 67th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf