China, Hong Kong SAR vs Slovakia: PK compounds — Export quantity
PK compounds — Export quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 12.64 t against 10.22 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 2.42 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.2 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Slovakia ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 65th and Slovakia ranks 63rd of 84 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.16 t | 5.42 t | 8.73 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 8.32 t | 18.7 t | 10.37 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — export quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 12.64 t against 10.22 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — export quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Slovakia?
- 2.42 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Slovakia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Slovakia rank globally for pk compounds — export quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 65th and Slovakia ranks 63rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf