Australia vs Guatemala: PK compounds — Export value
PK compounds — Export value over time
- Australia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1,487 1000 USD against 1,184 1000 USD in Guatemala, a difference of 303 1000 USD.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 24th and Guatemala ranks 27th of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.02 1000 USD | 62.71 1000 USD | 35.31 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 595.18 1000 USD | 136.89 1000 USD | 458.29 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 887.55 1000 USD | 1,011 1000 USD | 123.85 1000 USD | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — export value, Australia or Guatemala?
- Australia, at 1,487 1000 USD against 1,184 1000 USD in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — export value between Australia and Guatemala?
- 303 1000 USD, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for pk compounds — export value?
- Australia ranks 24th and Guatemala ranks 27th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf