Belgium vs China, mainland: PK compounds — Export value
PK compounds — Export value over time
- Belgium
- China, mainland
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 15,881 1000 USD against 13,340 1000 USD in China, mainland, a difference of 2,541 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times China, mainland's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 8th and China, mainland ranks 9th of 84 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | China, mainland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54,871 1000 USD | 2,553 1000 USD | 52,319 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 25,376 1000 USD | 4,602 1000 USD | 20,774 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 23,308 1000 USD | 10,007 1000 USD | 13,301 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — export value, Belgium or China, mainland?
- Belgium, at 15,881 1000 USD against 13,340 1000 USD in China, mainland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — export value between Belgium and China, mainland?
- 2,541 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and China, mainland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and China, mainland rank globally for pk compounds — export value?
- Belgium ranks 8th and China, mainland ranks 9th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf