Ecuador vs New Zealand: PK compounds — Export value
PK compounds — Export value over time
- Ecuador
- New Zealand
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 105.97 1000 USD against 53.23 1000 USD in New Zealand, a difference of 52.74 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 2.0 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was New Zealand ahead.
Ecuador ranks 54th and New Zealand ranks 56th of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.57 1000 USD | 179.07 1000 USD | 151.5 1000 USD | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 33.09 1000 USD | 189.8 1000 USD | 156.71 1000 USD | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 97.6 1000 USD | 74.94 1000 USD | 22.66 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — export value, Ecuador or New Zealand?
- Ecuador, at 105.97 1000 USD against 53.23 1000 USD in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — export value between Ecuador and New Zealand?
- 52.74 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for pk compounds — export value?
- Ecuador ranks 54th and New Zealand ranks 56th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf