Latvia vs Namibia: PK compounds — Export value
PK compounds — Export value over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 22.73 1000 USD against 12.14 1000 USD in Namibia, a difference of 10.59 1000 USD.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.9 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 66th and Namibia ranks 69th of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.84 1000 USD | 13.89 1000 USD | 39.95 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 9.19 1000 USD | 29.95 1000 USD | 20.75 1000 USD | Namibia |
| 2020s | 38.38 1000 USD | 22.28 1000 USD | 16.1 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — export value, Latvia or Namibia?
- Latvia, at 22.73 1000 USD against 12.14 1000 USD in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — export value between Latvia and Namibia?
- 10.59 1000 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for pk compounds — export value?
- Latvia ranks 66th and Namibia ranks 69th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf