Luxembourg vs Malaysia: PK compounds — Export value
PK compounds — Export value over time
- Luxembourg
- Malaysia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 278.45 1000 USD against 218.43 1000 USD in Malaysia, a difference of 60.02 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malaysia ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 45th and Malaysia ranks 47th of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 178.26 1000 USD | 385.24 1000 USD | 206.98 1000 USD | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 324 1000 USD | 167.21 1000 USD | 156.79 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 203.48 1000 USD | 856.29 1000 USD | 652.81 1000 USD | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — export value, Luxembourg or Malaysia?
- Luxembourg, at 278.45 1000 USD against 218.43 1000 USD in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — export value between Luxembourg and Malaysia?
- 60.02 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malaysia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Malaysia rank globally for pk compounds — export value?
- Luxembourg ranks 45th and Malaysia ranks 47th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf