Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: PK compounds — Export value
PK compounds — Export value over time
- Mauritius
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1.56 1000 USD against 0.14 1000 USD in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.42 1000 USD.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 11.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 81st of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.38 1000 USD | 0.23 1000 USD | 10.15 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 79.35 1000 USD | 13.42 1000 USD | 65.93 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1.56 1000 USD | 8.44 1000 USD | 6.88 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — export value, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
- Mauritius, at 1.56 1000 USD against 0.14 1000 USD in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — export value between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 1.42 1000 USD, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for pk compounds — export value?
- Mauritius ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 81st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf