Aruba vs Bangladesh: PK compounds — Import quantity

Aruba
0.02 t
in 2023
Bangladesh
0.02 t
in 2023
Aruba rank
178th
Bangladesh rank
178th

PK compounds — Import quantity over time

  • Aruba
  • Bangladesh
02468200820152023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.02 t against 0.02 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 178th and Bangladesh ranks 178th of 183 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Bangladesh Difference Ahead
2000s 0.31 t 0.03 t 0.28 t Aruba
2010s 2.56 t 1.67 t 0.895 t Aruba
2020s 0.02 t 0.02 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Aruba or Bangladesh?
Aruba, at 0.02 t against 0.02 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Aruba and Bangladesh?
0 t, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Bangladesh?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Bangladesh rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
Aruba ranks 178th and Bangladesh ranks 178th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 4,042 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf