Belarus vs Iraq: PK compounds — Import quantity

Belarus
46.94 t
in 2024
Iraq
49.05 t
in 2024
Belarus rank
123rd
Iraq rank
122nd

PK compounds — Import quantity over time

  • Belarus
  • Iraq
050100150200200220132024

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 49.05 t against 46.94 t in Belarus, a difference of 2.11 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iraq ahead.

Belarus ranks 123rd and Iraq ranks 122nd of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Iraq in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 32.65 t 65.65 t 33 t Iraq
2010s 40.06 t 31.1 t 8.96 t Belarus
2020s 145.09 t 16.61 t 128.48 t Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Belarus or Iraq?
Iraq, at 49.05 t against 46.94 t in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Belarus and Iraq?
2.11 t, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iraq?
19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Iraq rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
Belarus ranks 123rd and Iraq ranks 122nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 4,042 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf