Burkina Faso vs North Macedonia: PK compounds — Import quantity
PK compounds — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 155.43 t against 150 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 5.43 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 86th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 629.76 t | 189.69 t | 440.07 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 113.2 t | 259.06 t | 145.86 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 119 t | 82.83 t | 36.17 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Burkina Faso or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 155.43 t against 150 t in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Burkina Faso and North Macedonia?
- 5.43 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and North Macedonia rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 86th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf