Cambodia vs Luxembourg: PK compounds — Import quantity
PK compounds — Import quantity over time
- Cambodia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 922.15 t against 712.33 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 209.82 t.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Cambodia ranks 49th and Luxembourg ranks 52nd of 170 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.93 t | 1,037 t | 1,005 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 70.25 t | 1,981 t | 1,911 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 324.63 t | 949.4 t | 624.77 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Cambodia or Luxembourg?
- Cambodia, at 922.15 t against 712.33 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Cambodia and Luxembourg?
- 209.82 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Luxembourg?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Luxembourg rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
- Cambodia ranks 49th and Luxembourg ranks 52nd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf