Comoros vs Yemen: PK compounds — Import quantity

Comoros
40 t
in 2024
Yemen
39.07 t
in 2023
Comoros rank
125th
Yemen rank
127th

PK compounds — Import quantity over time

  • Comoros
  • Yemen
050100150200250200220132024

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 40 t against 39.07 t in Yemen, a difference of 0.93 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Yemen ahead.

Comoros ranks 125th and Yemen ranks 127th of 183 countries.

Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 1.3 t 12.5 t 11.2 t Yemen
2010s 36.86 t 90.32 t 53.46 t Yemen
2020s 1.57 t 22.87 t 21.3 t Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Comoros or Yemen?
Comoros, at 40 t against 39.07 t in Yemen as of 2024.
What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Comoros and Yemen?
0.93 t, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Yemen?
9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Yemen rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
Comoros ranks 125th and Yemen ranks 127th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 4,042 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf