Cuba vs Sri Lanka: PK compounds — Import quantity

Cuba
25.05 t
in 2024
Sri Lanka
25.13 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
140th
Sri Lanka rank
139th

PK compounds — Import quantity over time

  • Cuba
  • Sri Lanka
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k200320132024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 25.13 t against 25.05 t in Cuba, a difference of 0.08 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 140th and Sri Lanka ranks 139th of 183 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s 8,754 t 104.77 t 8,650 t Cuba
2020s 37.31 t 14.87 t 22.45 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Cuba or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 25.13 t against 25.05 t in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
0.08 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
Cuba ranks 140th and Sri Lanka ranks 139th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 4,042 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf