Dominican Republic vs Kyrgyzstan: PK compounds — Import quantity
PK compounds — Import quantity over time
- Dominican Republic
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 28.34 t against 28.11 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.23 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 136th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.12 t | 20 t | 11.88 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 87.69 t | 384.19 t | 296.5 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 105.16 t | 94.33 t | 10.83 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Dominican Republic or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 28.34 t against 28.11 t in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Dominican Republic and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.23 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Kyrgyzstan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Dominican Republic and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
- Dominican Republic ranks 136th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 135th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf