Israel vs Libya: PK compounds — Import quantity

Israel
269.3 t
in 2024
Libya
260.39 t
in 2024
Israel rank
76th
Libya rank
78th

PK compounds — Import quantity over time

  • Israel
  • Libya
0200400600200220132024

How they compare

Israel currently reports 269.3 t against 260.39 t in Libya, a difference of 8.91 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 76th and Libya ranks 78th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Libya Difference Ahead
2000s 8.9 t 249.09 t 240.19 t Libya
2010s 169.31 t 72.5 t 96.81 t Israel
2020s 125.26 t 207.68 t 82.43 t Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Israel or Libya?
Israel, at 269.3 t against 260.39 t in Libya as of 2024.
What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Israel and Libya?
8.91 t, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Libya?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Israel and Libya rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
Israel ranks 76th and Libya ranks 78th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 4,042 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf