Kenya vs Serbia: PK compounds — Import quantity

Kenya
77.52 t
in 2024
Serbia
79.92 t
in 2024
Kenya rank
109th
Serbia rank
108th

PK compounds — Import quantity over time

  • Kenya
  • Serbia
01.0k2.0k3.0k200220132024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 79.92 t against 77.52 t in Kenya, a difference of 2.4 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Kenya ranks 109th and Serbia ranks 108th of 183 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 625.09 t 1,716 t 1,091 t Serbia
2010s 490.36 t 634.83 t 144.47 t Serbia
2020s 83.68 t 371.29 t 287.61 t Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Kenya or Serbia?
Serbia, at 79.92 t against 77.52 t in Kenya as of 2024.
What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Kenya and Serbia?
2.4 t, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
Kenya ranks 109th and Serbia ranks 108th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 4,042 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf