Latvia vs Republic of Moldova: PK compounds — Import quantity
PK compounds — Import quantity over time
- Latvia
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1,087 t against 801.2 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 285.8 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 49th and Republic of Moldova ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.69 t | 0.85 t | 60.84 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 351.31 t | 38.91 t | 312.4 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2,116 t | 3,338 t | 1,222 t | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Latvia or Republic of Moldova?
- Latvia, at 1,087 t against 801.2 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Latvia and Republic of Moldova?
- 285.8 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Republic of Moldova?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Republic of Moldova rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
- Latvia ranks 49th and Republic of Moldova ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf