Luxembourg vs Morocco: PK compounds — Import quantity
PK compounds — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Morocco
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 712.33 t against 656.71 t in Morocco, a difference of 55.62 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 55th and Morocco ranks 56th of 183 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,467 t | 2,462 t | 1,005 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 2,327 t | 1,735 t | 592.24 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 901.98 t | 849.7 t | 52.29 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import quantity, Luxembourg or Morocco?
- Luxembourg, at 712.33 t against 656.71 t in Morocco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import quantity between Luxembourg and Morocco?
- 55.62 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Morocco?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Morocco rank globally for pk compounds — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 55th and Morocco ranks 56th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf