Argentina vs Zimbabwe: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Argentina
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 552.36 1000 USD against 471.21 1000 USD in Argentina, a difference of 81.15 1000 USD.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 366.44 1000 USD | 45.52 1000 USD | 320.92 1000 USD | Argentina |
| 2010s | 268.31 1000 USD | 4,928 1000 USD | 4,660 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 362.69 1000 USD | 333.11 1000 USD | 29.59 1000 USD | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Argentina or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 552.36 1000 USD against 471.21 1000 USD in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Argentina and Zimbabwe?
- 81.15 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Zimbabwe rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Argentina ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf