Azerbaijan vs Dominica: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Azerbaijan
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 200.51 1000 USD against 189.59 1000 USD in Azerbaijan, a difference of 10.92 1000 USD.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 98th and Dominica ranks 96th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Dominica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.06 1000 USD | 0.08 1000 USD | 2.98 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 342.06 1000 USD | 289.97 1000 USD | 52.09 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 343.56 1000 USD | 350.21 1000 USD | 6.64 1000 USD | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Azerbaijan or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 200.51 1000 USD against 189.59 1000 USD in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Azerbaijan and Dominica?
- 10.92 1000 USD, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Dominica?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Dominica rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 98th and Dominica ranks 96th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf