Azerbaijan vs El Salvador: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Azerbaijan
- El Salvador
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 189.59 1000 USD against 189.51 1000 USD in El Salvador, a difference of 0.08 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was El Salvador ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 98th and El Salvador ranks 99th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.67 1000 USD | 57.17 1000 USD | 53.5 1000 USD | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 342.06 1000 USD | 35.65 1000 USD | 306.41 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 312.77 1000 USD | 512.14 1000 USD | 199.37 1000 USD | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Azerbaijan or El Salvador?
- Azerbaijan, at 189.59 1000 USD against 189.51 1000 USD in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Azerbaijan and El Salvador?
- 0.08 1000 USD, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and El Salvador?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and El Salvador rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 98th and El Salvador ranks 99th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf