Bermuda vs New Caledonia: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Bermuda
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 45.89 1000 USD against 38.11 1000 USD in Bermuda, a difference of 7.78 1000 USD.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Bermuda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Bermuda ranks 132nd and New Caledonia ranks 131st of 183 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.63 1000 USD | 89.46 1000 USD | 80.83 1000 USD | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 4.9 1000 USD | 164.91 1000 USD | 160.02 1000 USD | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Bermuda or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 45.89 1000 USD against 38.11 1000 USD in Bermuda as of 2015.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Bermuda and New Caledonia?
- 7.78 1000 USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and New Caledonia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Bermuda and New Caledonia rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Bermuda ranks 132nd and New Caledonia ranks 131st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf