Bulgaria vs South Africa: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Bulgaria
- South Africa
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 2,185 1000 USD against 1,964 1000 USD in South Africa, a difference of 221 1000 USD.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 37th of 170 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 112.62 1000 USD | 80.96 1000 USD | 31.66 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 1,108 1000 USD | 271.63 1000 USD | 836.74 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 2,284 1000 USD | 1,177 1000 USD | 1,107 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Bulgaria or South Africa?
- Bulgaria, at 2,185 1000 USD against 1,964 1000 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Bulgaria and South Africa?
- 221 1000 USD, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and South Africa?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and South Africa rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Bulgaria ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 37th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf