Burkina Faso vs Mauritius: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Burkina Faso
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 25.43 1000 USD against 24.61 1000 USD in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.82 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 137th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 129.74 1000 USD | 9.46 1000 USD | 120.27 1000 USD | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 28.24 1000 USD | 48.09 1000 USD | 19.85 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 15.37 1000 USD | 57.79 1000 USD | 42.43 1000 USD | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Burkina Faso or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 25.43 1000 USD against 24.61 1000 USD in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Burkina Faso and Mauritius?
- 0.82 1000 USD, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Mauritius?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Mauritius rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 137th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf