Canada vs Republic of Korea: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Canada
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Canada currently reports 5,946 1000 USD against 5,183 1000 USD in Republic of Korea, a difference of 763 1000 USD.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Korea's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 16th and Republic of Korea ranks 18th of 183 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,733 1000 USD | 488.97 1000 USD | 1,244 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2010s | 4,078 1000 USD | 1,603 1000 USD | 2,475 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2020s | 6,799 1000 USD | 4,528 1000 USD | 2,272 1000 USD | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Canada or Republic of Korea?
- Canada, at 5,946 1000 USD against 5,183 1000 USD in Republic of Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Canada and Republic of Korea?
- 763 1000 USD, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Republic of Korea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Republic of Korea rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Canada ranks 16th and Republic of Korea ranks 18th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf