Costa Rica vs Ecuador: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1,874 1000 USD against 1,532 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 342 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 45th and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 529.11 1000 USD | 263.26 1000 USD | 265.85 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 451.17 1000 USD | 1,656 1000 USD | 1,204 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1,261 1000 USD | 2,757 1000 USD | 1,496 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Costa Rica or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 1,874 1000 USD against 1,532 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Costa Rica and Ecuador?
- 342 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ecuador?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Ecuador rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 45th and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf