Costa Rica vs Thailand: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Thailand
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1,532 1000 USD against 1,353 1000 USD in Thailand, a difference of 179 1000 USD.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 45th and Thailand ranks 46th of 183 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 529.11 1000 USD | 1,120 1000 USD | 590.62 1000 USD | Thailand |
| 2010s | 451.17 1000 USD | 4,808 1000 USD | 4,357 1000 USD | Thailand |
| 2020s | 1,261 1000 USD | 1,596 1000 USD | 335.18 1000 USD | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Costa Rica or Thailand?
- Costa Rica, at 1,532 1000 USD against 1,353 1000 USD in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Costa Rica and Thailand?
- 179 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Thailand?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Thailand rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 45th and Thailand ranks 46th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf