Czechia vs Paraguay: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Czechia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 2,425 1000 USD against 2,260 1000 USD in Czechia, a difference of 165 1000 USD.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Paraguay ahead.
Czechia ranks 36th and Paraguay ranks 34th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 938.31 1000 USD | 60,676 1000 USD | 59,738 1000 USD | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 1,671 1000 USD | 26,235 1000 USD | 24,564 1000 USD | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 2,895 1000 USD | 1,983 1000 USD | 911.73 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Czechia or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 2,425 1000 USD against 2,260 1000 USD in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Czechia and Paraguay?
- 165 1000 USD, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Paraguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Paraguay rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Czechia ranks 36th and Paraguay ranks 34th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf