Dominica vs Turkmenistan: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Dominica
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 215.57 1000 USD against 200.51 1000 USD in Dominica, a difference of 15.06 1000 USD.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 96th and Turkmenistan ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 326.22 1000 USD | 50.96 1000 USD | 275.26 1000 USD | Dominica |
| 2020s | 350.21 1000 USD | 173.74 1000 USD | 176.47 1000 USD | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Dominica or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 215.57 1000 USD against 200.51 1000 USD in Dominica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Dominica and Turkmenistan?
- 15.06 1000 USD, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Turkmenistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Turkmenistan rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Dominica ranks 96th and Turkmenistan ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf