Eswatini vs Georgia: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Georgia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 169.54 1000 USD against 151.77 1000 USD in Georgia, a difference of 17.77 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Georgia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 101st and Georgia ranks 104th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.84 1000 USD | 67.87 1000 USD | 20.97 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 105.1 1000 USD | 393.53 1000 USD | 288.43 1000 USD | Georgia |
| 2020s | 88.41 1000 USD | 389.78 1000 USD | 301.37 1000 USD | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Eswatini or Georgia?
- Eswatini, at 169.54 1000 USD against 151.77 1000 USD in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Eswatini and Georgia?
- 17.77 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Georgia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Georgia rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 101st and Georgia ranks 104th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf