Latvia vs Myanmar: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Latvia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 983.5 1000 USD against 889.48 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 94.02 1000 USD.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 55th and Myanmar ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 151.65 1000 USD | 32.13 1000 USD | 119.51 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 264.63 1000 USD | 32,448 1000 USD | 32,184 1000 USD | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 1,430 1000 USD | 74,850 1000 USD | 73,419 1000 USD | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Latvia or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 983.5 1000 USD against 889.48 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Latvia and Myanmar?
- 94.02 1000 USD, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Myanmar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Myanmar rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Latvia ranks 55th and Myanmar ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf