Latvia vs Singapore: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Latvia
- Singapore
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 889.48 1000 USD against 831.01 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 58.47 1000 USD.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 55th and Singapore ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.81 1000 USD | 27.8 1000 USD | 22.01 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 275.57 1000 USD | 752.26 1000 USD | 476.69 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2020s | 1,430 1000 USD | 608.47 1000 USD | 821.95 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Latvia or Singapore?
- Latvia, at 889.48 1000 USD against 831.01 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Latvia and Singapore?
- 58.47 1000 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Singapore rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Latvia ranks 55th and Singapore ranks 58th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf