Libya vs New Zealand: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Libya
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 704.28 1000 USD against 632.23 1000 USD in Libya, a difference of 72.05 1000 USD.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Zealand ahead.
Libya ranks 64th and New Zealand ranks 61st of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 939.22 1000 USD | 163.53 1000 USD | 775.69 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2010s | 243.83 1000 USD | 496.48 1000 USD | 252.65 1000 USD | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 420.24 1000 USD | 673.06 1000 USD | 252.82 1000 USD | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Libya or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 704.28 1000 USD against 632.23 1000 USD in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Libya and New Zealand?
- 72.05 1000 USD, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and New Zealand?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Libya and New Zealand rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Libya ranks 64th and New Zealand ranks 61st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf