Lithuania vs Norway: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Lithuania
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 400.57 1000 USD against 373.36 1000 USD in Lithuania, a difference of 27.21 1000 USD.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Norway ahead.
Lithuania ranks 77th and Norway ranks 74th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 336.35 1000 USD | 384.9 1000 USD | 48.55 1000 USD | Norway |
| 2010s | 807.1 1000 USD | 730.89 1000 USD | 76.21 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 3,309 1000 USD | 648.63 1000 USD | 2,661 1000 USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Lithuania or Norway?
- Norway, at 400.57 1000 USD against 373.36 1000 USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Lithuania and Norway?
- 27.21 1000 USD, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Lithuania ranks 77th and Norway ranks 74th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf