Madagascar vs Slovenia: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Madagascar
- Slovenia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 528.32 1000 USD against 475.36 1000 USD in Slovenia, a difference of 52.96 1000 USD.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Slovenia ahead.
Madagascar ranks 70th and Slovenia ranks 71st of 183 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 166.97 1000 USD | 1,517 1000 USD | 1,350 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 88.6 1000 USD | 978.23 1000 USD | 889.64 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 172.74 1000 USD | 481.69 1000 USD | 308.95 1000 USD | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Madagascar or Slovenia?
- Madagascar, at 528.32 1000 USD against 475.36 1000 USD in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Madagascar and Slovenia?
- 52.96 1000 USD, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Slovenia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Slovenia rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Madagascar ranks 70th and Slovenia ranks 71st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf