Romania vs South Africa: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Romania
- South Africa
How they compare
Romania currently reports 3,048 1000 USD against 1,964 1000 USD in South Africa, a difference of 1,084 1000 USD.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.6 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 28th of 183 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,519 1000 USD | 80.96 1000 USD | 1,438 1000 USD | Romania |
| 2010s | 3,341 1000 USD | 271.63 1000 USD | 3,070 1000 USD | Romania |
| 2020s | 5,012 1000 USD | 1,177 1000 USD | 3,836 1000 USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Romania or South Africa?
- Romania, at 3,048 1000 USD against 1,964 1000 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Romania and South Africa?
- 1,084 1000 USD, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Romania ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 28th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf