Slovenia vs Zimbabwe: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Slovenia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 552.36 1000 USD against 475.36 1000 USD in Slovenia, a difference of 77 1000 USD.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,401 1000 USD | 45.52 1000 USD | 1,356 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 880.62 1000 USD | 4,928 1000 USD | 4,047 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 483.28 1000 USD | 333.11 1000 USD | 150.17 1000 USD | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Slovenia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 552.36 1000 USD against 475.36 1000 USD in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Slovenia and Zimbabwe?
- 77 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and Zimbabwe rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Slovenia ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf