Sri Lanka vs Saint Lucia: PK compounds — Import value
PK compounds — Import value over time
- Sri Lanka
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 20.53 1000 USD against 18.69 1000 USD in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.84 1000 USD.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 144th and Saint Lucia ranks 142nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.9 1000 USD | 28.59 1000 USD | 3.31 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 7.07 1000 USD | 20.53 1000 USD | 13.46 1000 USD | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — import value, Sri Lanka or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 20.53 1000 USD against 18.69 1000 USD in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — import value between Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia?
- 1.84 1000 USD, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia rank globally for pk compounds — import value?
- Sri Lanka ranks 144th and Saint Lucia ranks 142nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf