Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Plant Growth Regulators — Agricultural Use

Australia and New Zealand
114 t
in 2017
Zimbabwe
133 t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
34th

Plant Growth Regulators — Agricultural Use over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 133 t against 114 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 19 t.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 155 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 96.4 t 133.2 t 36.8 t Zimbabwe
2000s 115.5 t 126.8 t 11.3 t Zimbabwe
2010s 114 t 139 t 25 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher plant growth regulators — agricultural use, Australia and New Zealand or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 133 t against 114 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in plant growth regulators — agricultural use between Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
19 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
28 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe rank globally for plant growth regulators — agricultural use?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Plant Growth Regulators — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Plant Growth Regulators — Agricultural Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/plant-growth-regulators-agricultural-use/australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/plant-growth-regulators-agricultural-use/australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/">Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Plant Growth Regulators — Agricultural Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Plant Growth Regulators — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 6,543 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains statistics on the agricultural use of major pesticide groups and of relevant chemical families. Data are disseminated by country, with global coverage and are updated annually. The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains information on the use of major pesticide groups:1. Insecticides (Chlorinated hydrocarbons, Organo-phosphates, Carbamates-insecticides, Pyrethroids, Botanical and biological products and Others not elsewhere classified);2. Mineral Oils;3. Herbicides (Phenoxy hormone products, Triazines, Amides, Carbamates-herbicides, Dinitroanilines, Urea derivatives, Sulfonyl urea, Bipiridils, Uracil, Others not elsewhere classified);4. Fungicides and Bactericides (Inorganic, Dithiocarbamates, Benzimidazoles, Triazoles, Diazoles, Diazines, Morpholines, Others not elsewhere classified);5. Plant Growth Regulators;6. Rodenticides (Anti-coagulants, Cyanide Generators, Hypercalcaemics, Narcotics, Others not elsewhere classified);7. Other Pesticides NES (not elsewhere specified).