Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Planted Forest — Area

Australia and New Zealand
4,492 1000 ha
in 2025
Chile
3,154 1000 ha
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
15th
Chile rank
17th

Planted Forest — Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Chile
2.0k3.0k4.0k199020072025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 4,492 1000 ha against 3,154 1000 ha in Chile, a difference of 1,338 1000 ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Chile's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Chile ranks 17th of 171 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 2,984 1000 ha 1,844 1000 ha 1,141 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 3,883 1000 ha 2,546 1000 ha 1,337 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 4,298 1000 ha 3,087 1000 ha 1,211 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 4,351 1000 ha 3,160 1000 ha 1,190 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher planted forest — area, Australia and New Zealand or Chile?
Australia and New Zealand, at 4,492 1000 ha against 3,154 1000 ha in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in planted forest — area between Australia and New Zealand and Chile?
1,338 1000 ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Chile?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Chile rank globally for planted forest — area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Chile ranks 17th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Planted Forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Planted Forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/planted-forest-area/australia-and-new-zealand/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/planted-forest-area/australia-and-new-zealand/chile/">Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Planted Forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Planted Forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 7,796 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.