Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Planted Forest — Area
Planted Forest — Area over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 11,491 1000 ha against 4,492 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 6,999 1000 ha.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.6 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th of 174 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,984 1000 ha | 7,418 1000 ha | 4,434 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 3,883 1000 ha | 8,754 1000 ha | 4,871 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 4,298 1000 ha | 10,111 1000 ha | 5,813 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 4,351 1000 ha | 11,148 1000 ha | 6,797 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher planted forest — area, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 11,491 1000 ha against 4,492 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in planted forest — area between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 6,999 1000 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for planted forest — area?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Planted Forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.