Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Planted Forest β€” Area

Chile
3,154 1000 ha
in 2025
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
11,491 1000 ha
in 2025
Chile rank
17th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th

Planted Forest β€” Area over time

  • Chile
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199020072025

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 11,491 1000 ha against 3,154 1000 ha in Chile, a difference of 8,337 1000 ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.6 times Chile's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 17th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 171 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 1,844 1000 ha 7,418 1000 ha 5,574 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 2,546 1000 ha 8,754 1000 ha 6,208 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 3,087 1000 ha 10,111 1000 ha 7,024 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 3,160 1000 ha 11,148 1000 ha 7,988 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher planted forest β€” area, Chile or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 11,491 1000 ha against 3,154 1000 ha in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in planted forest β€” area between Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
8,337 1000 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for planted forest β€” area?
Chile ranks 17th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Planted Forest β€” Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Planted Forest β€” Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/planted-forest-area/chile/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/planted-forest-area/chile/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Planted Forest β€” Area</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Planted Forest β€” Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 7,796 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.