Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Planted Forest — Share in Forest land

Australia and New Zealand
3.12 %
in 2025
Ethiopia
3.62 %
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
115th
Ethiopia rank
112th

Planted Forest — Share in Forest land over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Ethiopia
1234199020072025

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 3.62 % against 3.12 % in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.5 %.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 115th and Ethiopia ranks 112th of 174 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.18 % 1.26 % 0.9243 % Australia and New Zealand
2000s 2.74 % 1.87 % 0.861 % Australia and New Zealand
2010s 3.03 % 2.63 % 0.397 % Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.03 % 3.43 % 0.395 % Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher planted forest — share in forest land, Australia and New Zealand or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 3.62 % against 3.12 % in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in planted forest — share in forest land between Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
0.5 %, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia rank globally for planted forest — share in forest land?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 115th and Ethiopia ranks 112th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Planted Forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Planted Forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/planted-forest-share-in-forest-land/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/planted-forest-share-in-forest-land/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Planted Forest — Share in Forest land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Planted Forest — Share in Forest land
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 7,796 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.