Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Plywood and LVL — Import quantity, per capita
Equatorial Guinea
0.0007 m3 per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0008 m3 per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
144th
Eswatini rank
141st
Plywood and LVL — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0008 m3 per person against 0.0007 m3 per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 144th and Eswatini ranks 141st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0049 m3 per person | 0.0022 m3 per person | 0.0027 m3 per person | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.0012 m3 per person | 0.0038 m3 per person | 0.0026 m3 per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher plywood and lvl — import quantity, per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.0008 m3 per person against 0.0007 m3 per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in plywood and lvl — import quantity, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
- 0.0001 m3 per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for plywood and lvl — import quantity, per capita?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 144th and Eswatini ranks 141st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Plywood and LVL — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Plywood and LVL — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.