Japan vs Latvia: Plywood and LVL — Import quantity, per capita
Japan
0.0178 m3 per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.02 m3 per person
in 2024
Japan rank
51st
Latvia rank
48th
Plywood and LVL — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.02 m3 per person against 0.0178 m3 per person in Japan, a difference of 0.0022 m3 per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 48th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0351 m3 per person | 0.0005 m3 per person | 0.0345 m3 per person | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0352 m3 per person | 0.0083 m3 per person | 0.0269 m3 per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.0248 m3 per person | 0.0354 m3 per person | 0.0106 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.019 m3 per person | 0.0401 m3 per person | 0.0211 m3 per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher plywood and lvl — import quantity, per capita, Japan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.02 m3 per person against 0.0178 m3 per person in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in plywood and lvl — import quantity, per capita between Japan and Latvia?
- 0.0022 m3 per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for plywood and lvl — import quantity, per capita?
- Japan ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 48th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Plywood and LVL — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Plywood and LVL — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.