Cambodia vs Eswatini: Plywood and LVL — Import value, per capita
Cambodia
0.0011 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.001 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Cambodia rank
112th
Eswatini rank
113th
Plywood and LVL — Import value, per capita over time
- Cambodia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.0011 1000 USD per person against 0.001 1000 USD per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per person.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cambodia ranks 112th and Eswatini ranks 113th of 184 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.003 1000 USD per person | 0.0009 1000 USD per person | 0.0021 1000 USD per person | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.0017 1000 USD per person | 0.0011 1000 USD per person | 0.0006 1000 USD per person | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher plywood and lvl — import value, per capita, Cambodia or Eswatini?
- Cambodia, at 0.0011 1000 USD per person against 0.001 1000 USD per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in plywood and lvl — import value, per capita between Cambodia and Eswatini?
- 0.0001 1000 USD per person, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Eswatini rank globally for plywood and lvl — import value, per capita?
- Cambodia ranks 112th and Eswatini ranks 113th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Plywood and LVL — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Plywood and LVL — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.