Bermuda vs Zambia: Plywood and LVL — Import value, per unit of GDP
Bermuda
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zambia
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bermuda rank
135th
Zambia rank
136th
Plywood and LVL — Import value, per unit of GDP over time
- Bermuda
- Zambia
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Zambia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Bermuda has been ahead every year.
Bermuda ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 136th of 180 countries.
Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Bermuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher plywood and lvl — import value, per unit of gdp, Bermuda or Zambia?
- Bermuda, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in plywood and lvl — import value, per unit of gdp between Bermuda and Zambia?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Bermuda and Zambia rank globally for plywood and lvl — import value, per unit of gdp?
- Bermuda ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 136th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Plywood and LVL — Import value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Plywood and LVL — Import value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.