Eswatini vs Japan: Plywood and LVL — Import value, per unit of GDP
Eswatini
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Japan
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
81st
Japan rank
82nd
Plywood and LVL — Import value, per unit of GDP over time
- Eswatini
- Japan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Japan, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 81st and Japan ranks 82nd of 180 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Japan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher plywood and lvl — import value, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Japan?
- Eswatini, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in plywood and lvl — import value, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Japan?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Japan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Japan rank globally for plywood and lvl — import value, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 81st and Japan ranks 82nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Plywood and LVL — Import value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Plywood and LVL — Import value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.